- Stay ahead with the world's most comprehensive technology and business learning platform.
- Navigation menu
- Republican Jeff Flake Announces Retirement With a Warning That Trump Is ‘Dangerous’ to Democracy
- Jeff Flake Announces Exit and Says Trump Is ‘Dangerous’ to Democracy – Variety
The fissures are serious. Or, if you like a rhyme, Bannon versus Hannan. There may be no going back. To speak personally, I left the Republican party on the night of May 3, , when Trump clinched the nomination.
Decades longer. Even if I agreed with him on the issues — even if I thought his worldview sound — I would balk at supporting him, owing to the issue of character. The conservatives, chiefly, had taught me about the importance of character in high office, and it was too late for me to unlearn the lesson. I feel that this ground has collapsed beneath me.
Stay ahead with the world's most comprehensive technology and business learning platform.
That is one of the painful aspects of this moment. In all likelihood, you will never find a party that you are percent comfortable with. That you agree on every jot and tittle with. Particularly if there are only two major parties in your vast, continental nation! What about the issue of abortion? This is extremely important to me. What about education reform? How about a disdain for the truth? How about the acceptance of a steady stream of lies? I have never been a fan of Jeff Flake.
I have ripped him six ways to Sunday, chiefly over his stance on Cuba, which I have found incomprehensible. But, in saying what he said yesterday, and in writing the book he did, Jeff Flake stands very, very tall, and I will always admire him.
He did not go along to get along. He actually sacrificed his political career. He forwent holy reelection. And, again, I admire him a lot. Forget commentary about it including mine. This is the kind of thing that bears chewing over in individual minds. Yes, heaven help us. Here is some of what Flake quoted: The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants.
Most Popular. After the U. Read More. By George Will. If California senator Kamala Harris is elected president in and reelected in , by the time she leaves office months from now she might have a coherent answer to the question of whether Americans should be forbidden to have what million of them currently have: private health insurance. Her By Jack Crowe. By using a logarithmic scale, a linear relationship between the geometric index and the percentage of original flake weight lost through retouch is confirmed.
Republican Jeff Flake Announces Retirement With a Warning That Trump Is ‘Dangerous’ to Democracy
Alongside the various percussion and manipulation techniques described below, there is evidence that heat was at least sometimes used. Experimental archaeology has demonstrated that heated stones are sometimes much easier to flake, with larger flakes being produced in flint, for example. In some cases the heating changes the colour of the stone. Percussion reduction, or percussion flaking, refers to removal of flakes by impact. Generally, a core or other objective piece, such as a partially formed tool, is held in one hand, and struck with a hammer or percussor.
Alternatively, the objective piece can also be struck between a stationary anvil -stone, known as bipolar percussion. Percussion can also be done by throwing the objective piece at an anvil stone. This is sometimes called projectile percussion. Percussors are traditionally either a stone cobble or pebble, often referred to as a hammerstone , or a billet made of bone, antler, or wood. This technique is referred to as indirect percussion. Projectile percussion is so basic as to not be considered a technique. It involves throwing the toolstone at a stationary anvil stone.
This method provides virtually no control over how the toolstone will fragment, and therefore produces a great deal of shatter, and few flakes. It is difficult to be sure whether or not this method of lithic reduction was ever a commonplace practice, although noting sharp edges on a broken rock might have led early humans to first recognize the value of lithic reduction.
- Jeff Flake Announces Exit and Says Trump Is ‘Dangerous’ to Democracy – Variety;
- Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung, Urbanisierung und Industrialisierung in Südafrika (German Edition)!
- What Jeff Flake said: Full speech delivered in the US Senate;
- The Trespasser, Volume 3.
- Die besten 5 Surround-Lautsprecher (German Edition);
In bipolar percussion the objective piece of toolstone is placed on an anvil stone, and then the percussion force is applied to the tool stone. Unlike projectile percussion, the technique has some degree of control to it. Bipolar percussion is not popular with hobbyists, but there is evidence that bipolar percussion was the preferred way of dealing with certain problems.
Bipolar percussion has the benefit of producing many sharp flakes, and triangular pieces of stone which can be useful as drills. Bipolar percussion also does not require the manufacturer to locate a platform before setting to work, and bipolar percussion can produce sharp flakes almost the size of the original piece of tool stone. The lack of control makes bipolar percussion undesirable in many situations, but the benefits mean that it often has a use, especially if workable material is rare. Bipolar percussion is often used to break open small cobbles, or to have a second chance with spent lithic cores, broken bifaces, and tools that have been reworked so much that it is impossible to make further useful tools using traditional lithic reduction.
The end result of bipolar percussion is often a big mess, with only a few pieces that can be useful as cores or flakes for further working, but if other methods would result in a total dead-end, bipolar percussion may be desirable. An alternative view of the bipolar reduction technique is offered by Jan Willem Van der Drift which contradicts the suggestion that there is little control over fracturing.
The characteristics of bipolar reduction are different from that occurring in conchoidal fracture and are therefore often misinterpreted by archaeologists and lithic experts. Hard hammer techniques are generally used to remove large flakes of stone.
Jeff Flake Announces Exit and Says Trump Is ‘Dangerous’ to Democracy – Variety
Early flintknappers and hobbyists replicating their methods often use cobbles of very hard stone, such as quartzite. This technique can be used by flintknappers to remove broad flakes that can be made into smaller tools. This method of manufacture is believed to have been used to make some of the earliest stone tools ever found, some of which date from over 2 million years ago.
It is the use of hard-hammer percussion that most often results in the formation of the typical features of conchoidal fracture on the detached flake, such as the bulb of percussion and compression rings. Soft-hammer percussion involves the use of a billet, usually made of wood, bone or antler as the percussor. These softer materials are easier to shape than stone hammers, and therefore can be made into more precise tools. Soft hammers also deform around the sharp edges of worked stone, rather than shattering through them, making it desirable for working tool stone that already has been worked to some degree before.
Soft hammers of course also do not have as much force behind them as hard hammers do. Flakes produced by soft hammers are generally smaller and thinner than those produced by hard-hammer flaking; thus, soft-hammer flaking is often used after hard-hammer flaking in a lithic reduction sequence to do finer work. In most cases, the amount of pressure applied to the objective piece in soft-hammer percussion is not enough for the formation of a typical conchoidal fracture.
Rather, soft-hammer flakes are most often produced by what is referred to as a bending fracture, so-called because the flake is quite literally bent or "peeled" from the objective piece. A bending fracture can be produced with a hard hammer. Indirect percussion involves the use of a punch and hammer. The punch and hammer make it possible to apply large force to very small areas of a stone tool. Indirect percussion is therefore often used to achieve detail work on smaller tools. Some modern hobbyists make use of indirect percussion almost exclusively, with little or no pressure flaking to finish their work.
- Table of contents.
- Cornell & Diehl - Burley Flake #1 - Tobacco Reviews.
- Jeff Flake.
- A Quick and Dirty Overview of The Flake Manufacture Process.
Since indirect percussion can be so precisely placed, the platform is often much smaller on flakes produced in this way than in other methods of flake removal. Of course, indirect percussion requires two hands to hold the percussing tool set. One holds the hammer, and one holds the punch. Therefore, modern hobbyists must use a third object in order to hold the targeted piece of tool stone while they strike it. Often, some sort of clamp or vise is used. No evidence for such devices has yet been found in the archaeological record, but this is partly because they would normally be made of perishable materials, and partly because they can have great variation in design.
Pressure flaking is a method of trimming the edge of a stone tool by removing small lithic flakes by pressing on the stone with a sharp instrument rather than striking it with a percussor. This method, which often uses punches made from bone or antler tines or, among modern hobbyists, copper punches or even nails , provides a greater means of controlling the direction and quantity of the applied force than when using even the most careful percussive flaking.
Copper retoucheurs to facilitate this process were widely employed in the Early Bronze Age — and may therefore be associated with Beaker Culture in northwestern Europe.
Usually, the objective piece is held clasped in the flintknapper's hand, with a durable piece of fabric or leather protecting the flintknapper's palm from the sharpness of the flakes removed. The tip of the flaking tool is placed against the edge of the stone tool and pressed hard, removing a small linear or lunate flake from the opposite side. The process also involves frequent preparation of the edge to form better platforms for pressing off flakes. This is usually accomplished with abraiders made from a coarse-grained stone such as basalt or quartzite.
Great care must be taken during pressure flaking so that perverse fractures that break the entire tool do not occur.